When one thinks of summer, images of longer days and a slower pace often come to mind. However, recent record-breaking heat in Arizona has brought attention to the concerning future of the planet’s warmest season. The consequences of extreme heat extend far beyond Arizona, with heat-related deaths and power outages impacting vulnerable populations worldwide. As the effects of extreme heat become more severe, it raises the question: How can anyone live in such conditions? This article delves into the research conducted by Jennifer Vanos, an associate professor in the School of Sustainability at Arizona State University, and her team to explore the implications of extreme heat on human survivability and livability.
Vanos and her team challenge the commonly-used wet-bulb temperature of 35 degrees Celsius (95 degrees Fahrenheit) as the limit for human survivability. This whitepaper, published in Nature Communications, suggests that this limit oversimplifies the physiological impact of heat exposure and fails to account for variables such as age, activity level, and vulnerability factors. In order to provide a more accurate understanding of human survivability in extreme heat, the research explores a range of safe temperatures based on various characteristics.
Understanding that human health is influenced by both physiological and biophysical factors, the research conducted by Vanos and her team combines the expertise of climate scientists and physiologists. This collaboration allows for a comprehensive understanding of how climate outcomes can impact individuals on multiple levels. By considering the intertwined nature of heat and human health, the research brings attention to the need for a more realistic and human-based model for assessing the impacts of extreme heat.
The research not only aims to determine the conditions under which humans can survive but also emphasizes the importance of creating livable environments. Merely surviving in extreme heat does not guarantee a desirable quality of life. Factors such as the ability to spend time outdoors and engage in daily activities without experiencing a sustained rise in core temperature are vital to ensuring a livable environment. By providing a range of safe temperatures based on various characteristics, the research offers insights into how individuals can live their lives in a warming climate.
The commonly-used wet-bulb temperature of 35 degrees Celsius has significant implications for policy efforts, as it shapes our understanding of the impact of extreme heat on human health. However, this conservative estimate fails to capture the true severity of the issue. Using a more realistic, human-based model is crucial for developing effective policies that address the widespread and severe consequences of extreme heat. The research conducted by Vanos and her team serves as a call to action for policymakers to reevaluate existing strategies and invest in cooling infrastructure and personalized heat protection.
An essential takeaway from this research is the recognition that the effects of extreme heat can vary greatly depending on an individual’s health, age, and medication. What may be survivable for a young, healthy individual could pose a significant risk to someone with comorbidities or who is taking prescription medication. As we navigate the challenges of extreme heat, it is imperative to consider and prioritize the needs of populations who may be more vulnerable to its effects.
The survival ranges provided in this research offer valuable insights into the future impacts of extreme heat. It emphasizes the urgent need for proactive measures that consider the changing climate and its implications on human health. From increased cooling infrastructure to potential heat-driven migration, understanding and addressing the effects of extreme heat is crucial for creating a sustainable and livable future.
As extreme heat becomes an increasingly significant concern globally, it is essential to reevaluate our understanding of human survivability and livability in these conditions. The research conducted by Jennifer Vanos and her team challenges existing models and provides a more nuanced understanding of the impacts of extreme heat on human health. By considering a range of characteristics and variables, this research sheds light on the necessity for policy action and proactive measures to ensure a livable future for all, regardless of the temperature outside.
Leave a Reply